Bill Kurtis from CBS was quoted on WLS 890am saying the following regarding Ms Bialek...
Click => WLS full interview
“She has a history.”
“There is a lot more to this story.”
“I can assure you that there will be far more to this story.”
“Let’s put Herman or Sharon in the car and say their roles may even have been reversed, given her track record here.”
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2:00 pm
The frustrating thing is that in reality, we shall never know the truth. As such, we have to work with we have and what we have is rife with questions of character.
This morning,Joel Bennett, the lawyer for Karen Kraushaar, held a press conference to announce...a press conference. In short, more pathetic grabs for the limelight. We are assured her allegations are serious, but still fails to disclose those details. No, we must wait for the press conference, which shall include Kraushaar, Bialek, and possibly one or both of the other two accusers.
Taking a step back, it sure seems like the accusers and the lawyers have decided single accusations aren't effective enough to try and ultimate declare Cain guilty via the court of the media that they now must band together and create further media circus.
Keep in mind, only one has presented any details, and did so with a smile and emotion that doesn't correlate with someone who was sexually assaulted.
So let's take a deeper look at Bialek and Kraushaar:
Sharon Bialek
The Chicago Tribune published an article regarding her history. In the article, her fiance and father say they stand by her.
Well, of course they do! Why would this reporter expect otherwise? But let's look at the key information reported concerning her character in general as reported by the Tribune.
"However, the man she is now engaged to said she did not tell him about her history with the former Godfather's Pizza CEO until Friday night, when she told him she was going to New York for the news conference."
Records show she twice has filed for personal bankruptcy, first in 1991 and then again in 2001. In the latter case, she claimed $5,700 in assets and more than $36,000 in liabilities. Among the creditors seeking payment was a management firm demanding back rent of $4,500, four credit card companies and a lawyer asking for his legal fees.
The IRS filed a tax lien against her in 2009 for nearly $5,200. In August, the Illinois Department of Revenue claimed Bialek owed the state more than $4,300, including penalties and interest, relating to income taxes from 2004, according to county records.
Court records also show creditors took legal action against her during the past decade, including at least one lawsuit filed in Cook County.
Allred described her client as a "registered Republican," though Bialek does not have an active voter card in Illinois, election officials said. The state does not allow voters to register by party
Her father, Chester Bialek, said he did not know about his daughter's allegation until Monday. Reached at his home in Arizona, he said he was surprised by the revelation but supported her decision to come forward."
Click => Chicago Tribune
So ask yourself, if you are on the warpath to 'expose the truth', why would you fail to tell your father or at least, your fiance! Keep in mind, she confronted Cain back in Sept, supposedly
trying to get him to admit his wrong doings.
Now consider, Karen Kraushaar, who works for the Obama Administration. Today, the AP did their homework, surprisingly, and dug up some interesting background.
To settle the complaint at the immigration service, Kraushaar initially demanded thousands of dollars in payment, a reinstatement of leave she used after the accident earlier in 2002, promotion on the federal pay scale and a one-year fellowship to Harvard’s Kennedy School of Government, according to a former supervisor familiar with the complaint. The promotion itself would have increased her annual salary between $12,000 and $16,000, according to salary tables in 2002 from the U.S. Office of Personnel Management.
Kraushaar told the AP she considered her employment complaint “relatively minor” and she later dropped it.
“The concern was that there may have been discrimination on the job and that I was being treated unfairly,” Kraushaar said.
Kraushaar said Tuesday she did not remember details about the complaint and did not remember asking for a payment, a promotion or a Harvard fellowship. Bennett, her lawyer, declined to discuss the case with the AP, saying he considered it confidential. Kraushaar left her job at the immigration service after dropping the complaint in 2003, and she went to work at the Treasury Department.
Details of the workplace complaint that Kraushaar made at the immigration service are relevant because they could offer insights into how she responded to conflicts at work. She now works as a spokeswoman in the office of the Treasury Department’s inspector general for tax administration.
Details of the workplace complaint that Kraushaar made at the immigration service are relevant because they could offer insights into how she responded to conflicts at work."
Click => AP report
Ask yourself, how likely is it that she would not remember the details of her incident with Treasury, as far as what she asked for? Yet she can describe her multiple incidents with the 'monster', Herman Cain.
The ask yourself about the character of someone who gets in a car accident, can't travel to work, yet blames her employer for not allowing her to work from home, as if her misfortune is their problem.
No comments:
Post a Comment